Gaming monitors under 150

First of all, as with any other equipment purchase, you need to clearly define your budget: plan the amount that you are ready to part with relatively easily, and set the maximum bar to which you are ready to rise if necessary - in order to get the best gaming monitors under 150 of the most suitable for your requests. Without this, the selection process can take a long time, and if you connect to this the constant expectation of what the manufacturers will present in a month / quarter / six months, then even for a year or two, or even indefinitely.

Here we note the following: practice shows that most of the new on the market of monitors is a well-forgotten old in a new "wrapper", and for real and serious improvements, manufacturers at first ask too much. Thus, in most cases, you should focus on time-tested technologies or be ready to overpay for novelty and additional features / features.

At the second stage, you should decide whether the new monitor will be the only one on your desktop used to perform a variety of tasks, or whether it will become the second and will be used exclusively for games without serious requests for picture quality - the type of used one depends on it. matrices. There are often cases when a person is professionally engaged in photography, video or graphics, but does not deny himself the pleasure of spending a couple of hours playing the game process and wants to get a high-quality device "for everything at once." Then the choice is sharply limited and simplified. Likewise, if the buyer just needs the fastest monitor on the market, and he is ready to close his eyes to all its shortcomings, even if there are a lot of these shortcomings.

Next, we immediately go directly to the technical moments of the choice, not forgetting that in this material we will consider only the segment of real "gaming monitors", to which only models with a vertical frequency of 100 Hz and above can be ranked. We know that many manufacturers are trying to attribute models with 60-75 Hz to this class, but let it remain on their conscience, because with the same success almost all solutions released over the past 10-15 years could be called "gaming" - the only difference is in the support of adaptive synchronization systems, which remove gaps and some jitter of the picture, but are not able to increase the smoothness of what is happening on the screen while maintaining the already familiar vertical frequency.